Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:13:32 +0530
References: <C60E7F45-64DE-49A7-BD1B-12AD6E0F13D8@fastmail.com> <56C3C4B5.4000209@summaventures.com>

Actually the batteries are a plus - I have a few Lumix ones lying around
from the days of the GF1!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>
wrote:

> One of the best-written reviews I have read in a long time. Personally I'd
> rather it could take other M-lenses. But hey, that's just me. He's
> definitely
> produced some great shots with it.
>
> Peter
>
> On 15/02/2016 23:22, Adam Bridge wrote:
> > This review is getting lots of play over on the techie side:
> >
> > <http://craigmod.com/sputnik/leica_q/>
> >
> > If this has been posted already my apologies, the volume on the LUG
> sometimes overwhelms me and a week will go by without even skimming it.
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> > Enjoy,
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> --
>
> ===========================================================
> Dr Peter Dzwig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q)