Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodachrome
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:44:21 -0500
References: <EF5F88B1-5C1D-42E2-91CD-2A870EF4C0B9@me.com> <35709B36-7640-4475-A517-8F168402C23F@rabinergroup.com> <CA+3n+_m+AR7dvXoS+261A1V2yDxfszxZ5g3sgb4QCHQxyrbK3g@mail.gmail.com>

Shooting SX-70's again is going to be like the whole world went to heaven. 
One of the greatest photo machines ever invented by far. Sonar focusing! 
Who'd a thunk!

 
 

-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

?On 2/14/18, 7:19 AM, "LUG on behalf of Don Dory via LUG" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at 
leica-users.org> wrote:

    However, Polaroid is now selling SX-70 film again having purchased it 
back
    from Impossible Project and fixed the weird color issues.  I am now 
digging
    around for my SX-70 camera to start the whole knitting needle on image
    thing again.
    
    As to Kodachrome, I can't imagine bringing back that process even for 
fine
    art creative types.  I suspect this is just a method to make a little 
money
    on nostalgia like the Life Magazine specials that appear every quarter or
    so.
    
    On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:
    
    > I think slide films are at the bottom now selling wise. They don't 
sell a
    > lot of the stuff. The last years of Kodachrome not a lot of people were
    > buying it but quite a few were buying and using Fujichrome.  
Fujichrome did
    > replace Kodachrome in the hearts and minds of most serious 
photographers
    > you got it back and hour later instead of a few days and the color was
    > great.
    > It certainly replaced Ektachrom which always was cyan and horrible. 
But no
    > one used it. Fujichrome ruled.
    > Me I mainly shot color neg and black and white neg.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    >
    > Mark William Rabiner
    > Photographer
    >
    > ?On 2/14/18, 2:18 AM, "LUG on behalf of Gerry Walden via LUG"
    > <lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of
    > lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
    >
    >     I am intrigued that Kodak are now pushing Kodachrome photography
    > (note, I did not say Kodachrome is back) by publishing a new Kodachrome
    > magazine, edition 2 of which is now available at a price of ?20 here 
in the
    > UK. It features Kodachrome images from the archives but is very 
expensive
    > for what it is. I also note that a contact sheet featured in Edition 2 
was
    > shot on Ilford HP5, but it is what the featured photographer was using
    > ?back in the day?.
    >
    >     Does this re-emergence mean that they are trying to raise interest 
in
    > Kodachrome again? Pretty unlikely, but a strange move.
    >
    >     Gerry
    >
    >     Gerry Walden
    >     023 8046 3076
    >     0797 287 7932
    >
    >
    >     _______________________________________________
    >     Leica Users Group.
    >     See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
information
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Leica Users Group.
    > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    >
    
    
    
    -- 
    Don
    don.dory at gmail.com
    
    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Kodachrome)
In reply to: Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Kodachrome)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Kodachrome)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Kodachrome)