Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 15 10:49:18 2007
References: <002e01c83d7b$d40617e0$6400a8c0@corp.nortel.com> <43947DDB653551B8C85FD332@hindolveston.reid.org> <00c601c83db1$fe075be0$fa1613a0$@net> <DCEF0A99-624F-49ED-B01D-9039051D064F@mac.com> <200712151658.AHW98884@rg5.comporium.net> <009601c83f47$ef46c680$cdd45380$@net>
I'll hope that they give us a choice.
Re: testing. The only way that one could scientifically test the
effect of the IR cutoff filter placed directly in front of the sensor
would be: in the lab: with the same lens focused, on the same sensor,
with, and without the 'specified' filter.
Do we know that this was 'not' tested during R&D by Leica and/or Kodak?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Dec 15, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Frank Filippone wrote:
> And the M9 will have the glass filter.....or so I predict.....
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)