Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 15 11:07:17 2007
References: <002e01c83d7b$d40617e0$6400a8c0@corp.nortel.com> <43947DDB653551B8C85FD332@hindolveston.reid.org> <00c601c83db1$fe075be0$fa1613a0$@net> <DCEF0A99-624F-49ED-B01D-9039051D064F@mac.com> <200712151658.AHW98884@rg5.comporium.net> <009601c83f47$ef46c680$cdd45380$@net>
Why do you suppose this back
<http://www.popphoto.com/cameraaccessories/733/kodak-dcs-pro-
back-645h-the-ultimate-snap-on-tool-page2.html>
has a removable IR filter and optional IR/AA filter?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Dec 15, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Frank Filippone wrote:
> There is no proof that this is true. We are told it, we believe
> it, but no
> one has seen the same sensor in the same camera with and without the
> "proper" glass interference filter in front of the sensor......
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)