Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They possibly do, but that would likely only appeal to the Leica market whereas Audi designed maybe opens up a new market.... john -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Peter Dzwig Sent: Sunday, 27 April 2014 10:33 a.m. To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Audi designed Leica T If you are going for that market you would go for McLaren, Porsche or Audi in cars, (probably). But that wasn't my point; what I don't understand is why Leica doesn't have the sort of expertise in-house to achieve what they need. Given that in their very specialised area design-engineering is what they are renowned for it surprises me that they look elsewhere. Peter On 25/04/2014 16:18, lrzeitlin at aol.com wrote: > Invoking a prestige automobile designer as the inspiration for ?a new > camera is par for Leica. The first Leica mass market digitals, the Digilux > and the Digilux Zoom, were allegedly designed by Porsche. Basically they > were repackaged Fuji 1700 and 1700 Zoom cameras sold at a 50% markup in > price. As I said, par for the course. > Larry Z > - - -? > "I would love to understand the real reasons for Leica going to Audi > for the design. They make good cars, but aren't exactly renowned for > their cameras. I suppose it was just a prestige thing to bump up the > price." > > Peter >