Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter I think maybe some confusion between styling and engineering design? On the last it was indeed all in house as was the M the S the x and the T On Sunday, 27 April 2014, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> wrote: > If you are going for that market you would go for McLaren, Porsche or Audi > in > cars, (probably). > > But that wasn't my point; what I don't understand is why Leica doesn't > have the > sort of expertise in-house to achieve what they need. Given that in their > very > specialised area design-engineering is what they are renowned for it > surprises > me that they look elsewhere. > > Peter > > On 25/04/2014 16:18, lrzeitlin at aol.com <javascript:;> wrote: > > Invoking a prestige automobile designer as the inspiration for ?a new > camera is par for Leica. The first Leica mass market digitals, the Digilux > and the Digilux Zoom, were allegedly designed by Porsche. Basically they > were repackaged Fuji 1700 and 1700 Zoom cameras sold at a 50% markup in > price. As I said, par for the course. > > Larry Z > > - - -? > > "I would love to understand the real reasons for Leica going to Audi > for the > > design. They make good cars, but aren't exactly renowned for their > cameras. I > > suppose it was just a prestige thing to bump up the price." > > > > Peter > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > -- > > =========================================================== > Dr Peter Dzwig > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman