Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?
From: "Miro Jurcevic" <miroj@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 01:10:16 +1000
References: <e3.8b5fb76.26cdbb7b@aol.com> <000d01c0089d$846d09c0$9133a4cb@rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <399C9BEF.18DAF1BF@home.com>

Dear Ted,

I accidentally read something you wrote, and you accidentally didn't read
something I wrote.

1. I have never had a BAD nikon. They are almost bullet-proof.
2. I have never owned an electronic camera that needed a battery to go
click.
3. I have never bought a new camera
4. I will never buy a new camera.
5. I do not need a new camera.
6. If Leicas are so good, why do so many people that own, never use them.
Obviously used Leicas last a lot longer than stored models.
7. Why does a IIIg work perfectly, and a R4, R4s, R7, R6, R8 all fail.

You have all the answers to questions that I have never asked you. I am
going to find those questions and then slot the answers in. At which time I
will happily ignore your advice, since I still think R cameras are rubbish
and I can't wait till I find one that works. After all, I have more lenses
than days in the week.

Miro


> Buy only Canon or Nikon
>
> Then you can complain on their lists
>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?)
Reply from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?)
In reply to: Message from Photovilla@aol.com ([Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from "Miro Jurcevic" <miroj@ozemail.com.au> ([Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)