Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 11:51:07 -0800
References: <20010106135708.27483.cpmta@c014.sfo.cp.net> <014a01c077f9$add5b5c0$460c0923@com> <00f501c07808$8247f800$5c82e0d8@joecodis>

Joe Codispoti wrote:
> 
> I have used Contax since the late seventies when it was introduced. Since
> then I have tried and used many bodies and most lenses. I have never had a
> failure. The Contax RX is the best buy in the manual-focus group and offers
> the most features including integrated winder. What I like most about Contax
> is the lack of mirror slap in making the exposure. The electronically
> controlled vertical shutter is very smooth and precise. The lenses are
> superb and cost half the price of Leica R. Soon I will replace my
> manual-focus system and the 10 lenses I have with the new N1 series,
> especially since Contax will introduce a high resolution digital body in the
> Spring.
> 
> Joe Codispoti

At pro photo here in Portland Oregon yesterday there was a guy looking at some
older Contax slrs's on the counter.
I was immediately interested becuae I've had my eye on an RTSIII as i keep saying.
He said he'd been using them for years.
I asked him where he takes them for when the break.
He said "I don't know, none of mine has ever broke."

mark :) rabiner

updated temporary Website by "Foxy": http://spokenword.to/rabiner/
(consisting of late night E-mail descriptions of photos)

In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <merlin@flyingemu.com> (Re: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes)
Message from "Steven A. Melnyk" <melnyk@msu.edu> (Re: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes)