Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use"
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:09:05 -0800
References: <006001c0b6b4$9bbb8460$b1111840@dimarcojr.pressroom.com> <003d01c0b6cb$a8748a00$511a4d18@gv.shawcable.net> <3AC0EB6A.D570C17A@webshuttle.ch>
Hi Nathan,
Just call them what they are.... your photographs!
Simply because today "prints of amazing quality" not necessarily great
content, are being made that just blow yer socks of at how beautiful they
are.
By the same token we have amazing quality prints still being made in the wet
darkroom, not necessarily great content, that just blow yer socks of at how
beautiful they are.
So how you made the prints to me is completely irrelevant as it's the
content that counts not the medium they are printed on. Unless one is a
stuffy museum curator! ;-)
Does that not sound reasonable?
ted
Ted Grant Photography Limited
www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant
Replies:
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
In reply to:
Message from "Sal DiMarco,Jr." <sdmp007@pressroom.com> ([Leica] Re: SNAPS & England & the LHS)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")