Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan - scanner
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 07:33:25 +0200
References: <01C0B836.40AB8060.jem.kime@cwcom.net> <5.0.2.1.2.20010329161431.01dcd030@127.0.0.1> <3AC3F0E8.5CEA5686@hemenway.com> <3AC40E0B.B573E466@webshuttle.ch> <3AC52BBE.AAAC06D5@hemenway.com>

Jim,

I guess I was not making myself clear. The Nikon LS-2000 comes with two adapters: (1)
the MA-20 slide mount adapter and (2) the SA-20 strip film adapter. When using the
strip film adapter, you just slide the end of the film strip (up to 6 negatives) into
the opening and the adapter just sucks the film in. You can then view the thumbnails
and select which ones to preview and scan. Sounds good, except that I find that with
most of the films I use it jams. It works fine with C41 films but I use mainly B&W and
for some reason it does not like them.

The other way to scan film is using the slide mount adapter and the FH-2 film holder.
You put the strip into the film holder, align with the openings, and slide it into the
MA-20. This is fail-safe but a bit fiddly, but due to the above problem this is the
method I always use for scanning negatives. The FH-2, like a slide mount, robs you of a
little bit of the image along the edges. Actually it is slightly better in this respect
than a slide mount because you only lose areas along the top and bottom of the frame,
not the sides, whereas with a slide mount the loss is all the way around.

Nathan

Jim Hemenway wrote:

> Hi Nathan:
>
> I guess there's some difference then between the two different negative
> holders. I can get enough of the frame included to my satisfaction but I
> have to "jiggle" the negative a lot whilst viewing very closely over the
> light box. Then, after spending too much time doing that, the holder,
> like yours jams frequently. I don't scan that many negatives anymore but
> when I do find that I have a lot less frustration if I temporarily mount
> them in a Polaroid slide mount for a quick scan.
>
> Mostly I shoot Ektachrome and Provia these days when using 35mm.
>
> Jim

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> ([Leica] Re: Scanner edge detail loss)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan - scanner)
In reply to: Message from Jem Kime <jem.kime@cwcom.net> (RE: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up)
Message from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan - scanner)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Nathan - scanner)
Message from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan - scanner)