Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 400 B&W
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:37:34 -0800
References: <37.23fe63af.29bb887d@aol.com> <3C8A356E.6020009@ldp.com> <p05100314b8b0033cacca@[209.53.33.241]> <3C8A6B40.D28EB8B7@markrabiner.com>

This is a interesting and serious point, Mark.  I had not seen it
before.  How do you measure it -- are there any empirical studies that
speak to this issue?  If so, I would like to know as I am considering
going to this type of film as my main film.

Thank you, Mark.

Ted in Olalla

>Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 12:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] 400 B&W

> Chromegic film fades while you look at it.
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.markrabiner.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] 400 B&W)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] 400 B&W)
In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] 400 B&W)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] 400 B&W)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 400 B&W)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] 400 B&W)