Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: re: dishonesty on the lug
From: "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:39:41 -0400
References: <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA2581843B9@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu> <5.1.1.6.2.20020825094629.03f11790@pop.alink.net>

I think we are all ignoring the elephant in the drawing room.
The Leica realm is pretty darn rarified.
If you are here - chances are pretty good that you don't need to rip anyone
off.

Eric

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brick" <jim@brick.org>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: [Leica] RE: re: dishonesty on the lug


> I have bought and sold a ton of stuff to/from LUGgers. Easily $15,000 to
> $20,000 worth over the past five or so years. I have ALWAYS shipped
> immediately and told the LUGger to either send me a check if they like the
> item or send the item back if it is not what they wanted.
>
> I have NEVER been disappointed. I have ALWAYS received the check and only
> two times did I receive the item back. And that wasn't because of any
fault
> with the item. In one case, the person two weeks later decided that they
> really wanted the item, but it was gone.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jeffery Smith <JLS@runbox.com> (Re: [Leica] RE: re: dishonesty on the lug)
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] RE: re: dishonesty on the lug)
In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] re: dishonesty on the lug)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] RE: re: dishonesty on the lug)