Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Electronic vs. Mechanical
From: "Dizel" <webmaster@fucha.pl>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:09:01 +0100
References: <D6446A14-03BC-11D7-9849-003065D6E648@umich.edu> <039f01c297ce$b7505eb0$4d02a8c0@NEUROSOFT>

> As for mechanical shutter accuracy - you all know best how good mechanical
> shutter is.

should be:
as we know that mechanical shutter is enoughly accurate for any photographic work,
if properly adjusted. Electronic shutter doesn't give a lot to photographer
working in manual mode. Also: when camera with electronic shutter shows
selected speed, it shows only a value it choosed. Please consider a led
shutter speed display - as in many older SLRs - you see '500' as
camera selected shutter speed. You decide to overexpose two stops and
turn exposure correction wheel until '125' is shown. Right?
WRONG! as in first case camera-selected shutter speed could be anything
from 1/375 to 1/750, in second case it could be anything between
1/90 and 1/180. So you corrected somewhere between 1 and 3 stops.. :)

Electronical shutter has some other drawbacks, depending of construction.
It frequently drains batteries on B setting. It is frequently a lot
more sensitive to dust than mechanical one, as electromagnets operate
in small distances from parts they hold and even small grain of sand
can stop them from functioning. More: electrolytic capacitors in electronic
cameras die very quickly or lose their capacitance. 
- --  
                                St.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Dante Stella <dante@umich.edu> ([Leica] Electronic vs. Mechanical)
Message from "Dizel" <webmaster@fucha.pl> (Re: [Leica] Electronic vs. Mechanical)