Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT Epson 2200 for B/W. What's the verdict?
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 07:45:45 -0500
References: <BA460A6F.12C2%simon@camera-craftsman.com> <001901c2b9f7$50e15300$9cad5018@gv.shawcable.net> <p05100307ba46b34055e8@[203.208.74.246]>

Alastair, the reason companies are moving digital printing to photographic
paper is twofold.
First, the money to be made by Kodak, Fuji, et al is in selling paper and
chemistry.  Also, process, control, and longevity are well known variables.
The only hard part was designing the three color lasers needed to expose the
paper.

The second reason is that very few companies are willing to spend the R&D to
create a whole new system to accomplish the same thing, printing images.  On
the smaller scale only Epson was willing to drive the ink jet market from a
poor persons business printer to the industry standard for independent
photographers.  This took what, five or so years from the first Photo Stylus
printer?

Ever since the SciTech machines almost everyone has known that manipulating
visual information in the digital realm provided far more control.  Also,
once manipulated, you can generate infinite exact copies easily.  Of course,
imagine "Moonrise over Hernandez" printed a billion times and that thought
is not entirely pleasant.

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "firkin" <firkin@balhpl01.ncable.net.au> ([Leica] Re: OT Epson 2200 for B/W. What's the verdict?)
In reply to: Message from Simon Stevens <simon@camera-craftsman.com> ([Leica] OT Epson 2200 for B/W. What's the verdict?)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] OT Epson 2200 for B/W. What's the verdict?)
Message from Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> (Re: [Leica] OT Epson 2200 for B/W. What's the verdict?)