Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Kit, I would argue with you about Verisign, at least as far as customer service at Network Solutions. In six years of doing this, (yes, I am a legacy customer,) I've had two problems, both when changing from one web host to another. In both cases, the problem was solved within moments by a live customer service representative. Contrast that with hundreds of complaints I've seen about web hosts who take your money and "forget" to renew your registration. There are several people on this list who have had that happen. I think I would NEVER have the same registrar to host my site. By the way, if you are interested in a really good host who pays attention to problems, and can be easily reached, try Colin Vorseh at colin@availabledark.com Yeah, that one. A fine Leica photog, and a great host. Fast servers, lots of room, reasonable price. I moved to his servers at the beginning of the month, and everything went smoothly. SonC Saturday, November 15, 2003, 7:54:23 AM, you wrote: KM> Gene-- KM> Setting up a web site is very simple, really. And if all you really want to KM> do is to create a place for your own gallery, there is really no need for KM> any fancy dynamic programming as in ASP, JSP, or ColdFusion. I would not KM> recommend those technologies for a novice. The learning curve alone will KM> more than frustrate you and make the process onerous rather than fun. Once KM> you get your feet wet, you might want to go that route, but I would not KM> suggest it at first. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a static KM> HTML Web site. In fact, it would be a great idea to get very proficient and KM> comfortable creating a static site first before you move on to creating a KM> Web application (that's what a dynamic site is, a Web application). It is KM> essential, anyway, to be able to create good static pages and also learn how KM> sites are organized before moving on to those technologies, anyway. KM> Speaking as one who does this all day long at the day job--I recommend using KM> Macromedia products. They are extremely easy to learn. If you have Photoshop KM> and use it for processing your images that you've scanned, or that are KM> already in digital format, that's great. It also isn't necessarily KM> necessary, if you don't have it. KM> I really like the functionality of Dreamweaver MX and Fireworks MX, both of KM> which are packaged as a bundle as MX Studio (along with Flash, too, and KM> Freehand) and are a great ensemble for creating your pages, managing the KM> site itself, and processing images. Also, if you find yourself interested in KM> ASP, JSP, or ColdFusion sometime down the road, Dreamweaver MX has KM> everything you need in the interface to work in those languages, already KM> built-in. The program itself is a great teacher, and Macromedia has great KM> tutorials built-in to the software to help you find your way. Also, it has a KM> code-view option that allows you to see the source code while you are also KM> working in a WYSIWYG GUI. (What You See Is What You Get Graphical KM> Interface). Dreamweaver also has a very good FTP utility built-in (this is KM> the function that allows you to connect to your Web server and upload your KM> HTML and graphics files), and it helps keep things very nicely organized. KM> As for hosting, there are also some great and inexpensive options out there KM> for that, too. On some of our projects, we work with a company in Texas KM> pretty frequently--Global Knowledge Group, in College Station -- www.gkg.net KM> -- and you can register a domain name there for less than $10 a year, and KM> they also have some very reasonable hosting options, too ... some as low as KM> $5 a month. I have several sites registered and hosted with them for about KM> $10 a month apiece. They also have a deal going that gives you a break on KM> hosting if you register your domain with them. They are also long on KM> customer service and very easy to work with. (I have no association with KM> them in any business capacity other than being a customer, and have had very KM> good luck with them). KM> (N.B.: I would NOT, under any circumstance, register a domain through KM> Verisign. They are very pricey, customer service is awful (they're too big) KM> and when you find out that there are other less expensive options out there KM> for renewing and re-registering, you'll have to give up your first-born KM> child to get your domain out of their control. They aren't happy to have KM> lost their monopoly on domain registrations, and will do whatever it takes KM> to make it hard for you to tear yourself away from them.) KM> Kit KM> On Nov 14, 2003, at 1:38 PM, grduprey@rockwellcollins.com wrote: >> Of >> course the photos will be from Leica cameras - Just to keep this on >> topic. >> I would really like some help/advice to get me started. KM> -- KM> To unsubscribe, see KM> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- Best regards, Sonny mailto:sonc@sonc.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html