Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: 35mm color vs. the tyranny now.. T-max dev.
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:21:18 -0800
References: <200312071738.hB7HcaPB010378@mxsf08.cluster1.charter.net>

At 9:40 AM -0800 12/7/03, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
>To make matters worse, when T-max came out, I was shooting in the Palm
>Springs-Indio area at least 3-5 times a month. All middle of the day shoots.
>That's where I learned to go one stop over on exposure, with flash fill, and
>pull back 20-30% in the processing.
>But more importantly was the issue of consistent temperature controls. I
>found that if my stopbath was more than 2-3 degrees over the developer temp,
>the highlights would blow out. Then of course, if one is using daylight
>tanks, the dev. temp. would go up 2-3 degrees, adding that much more
>aggravation to the whole experience. In hot weather, I use water jackets to
>maintain a semblance of temp. control.
>Slobodan Dimitrov
>

I've tried Tmax at various times since it came out, and have varied 
development and exposure over a wide range. I am still not very happy 
with it. It just doesn't have a proper shoulder, and the toe isn't 
too good either. For me, these areas define the 'user-friendliness' 
of a film. In a studio situation, where things like lighting and 
contrast ratios can be well controlled, T-max is an excellent choice, 
but in field work, where lighting ratios often are what they are, 
T-max has proven to be an unending pain.

I'd shoot a range of interior architectural shots, and I'd come home 
and have 3-5 different development conditions if I wanted really good 
negs. With FP4 or HP5, I would have 2, at the very most. No contest. 
And the FP4 and HP5 would still be easier to print. True, if done 
right T-max definitely had finer grain, but for me the easier 
solution by far was to go up one format size, or down one film speed, 
and use a conventional film.

Tri-X I like, and HP5 gives me almost an extra useable stop for a 
very little additional grain. For finer grain I turn now to Delta 
100, which, while not having as forgiving a nature as FP4, has about 
a 2 stop advantage when developed for the same grain. The Delta film 
have a lot less problem with blown highlights than T-max, and have 
almost the same acutance and grain. X-tol has saved these films for 
me!

So if T-max fades from the planet, I couldn't care less. I do very 
little studio work, and the real world out there responds much better 
to other films.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] WAS: 35mm color vs. the tyranny now.. T-max dev.)