Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:33:46 -0500

All,
More importantly, the 4:3 makes more efficient use of the silicone
wafer.  More chips per 9" wafer, more profit to the chip manufacturer.

Unfortunately, most people get 3.5x5 or 4x6 inch prints which means
grandma gets her head cut off and junior just lost her feet because Dad
didn't know that when he sent the image to Ofoto that his chip wasn't in
the same ratio.

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Mark
Rabiner
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:15 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2

hlritter@mindspring.com wrote:
> 
> The Leica website describes the Digilux 2 sensor as a "2/3-inch CCD"
without elaboration. If this describes the long dimension of a
rectangular sensor, then it would seem that the camera has a sensor
measuring about 17mm x 11mm if it has the same proportion as the 35mm
film frame--in other words, close to exactly half the linear size of the
35mm frame. The problem is, the multiplier from the Digilux lens to the
35mm equivalent is 4, not about 2, as indicated by the figures given
(7-22.5mm actual, 28-90mm equivalent). It also doesn't work if the 2/3"
refers to the diagonal, as the 35mm diagonal is about 43mm, or about 2.5
times 2/3". Nor if it means 2/3 of a SQUARE inch, as that is produced by
a 1.5:1 rectangle of about 25mm x 17mm, requiring a multiplier of about
1.5.
> 
> So--what are the dimensions of the Digilux 2's sensor, and what does
the 2/3" refer to?
> 
> --howard
> 
> --
I cant see how you'd assume it has the same proportion as the 35mm film
frame.
I'd assume it would be more square than that. 2 over 3.
I'd assume 3 over 4 which is the shape of an 8x10 sheet of paper.
This would make more efficient use of the image circle.

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html