Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jerry, Canon sells the body alone for 899 and the body with lens for 999, checking on my calculator to make sure, I come up with 100 difference. Now I could be mistaken but I suspect Richard was jesting about the lens being 999 and the body being free, lighten up, it's not the end of the world that he made his choice. His choice. His opinion. Nice thing we still have here - at least for now given the current Washington thinking. Bill - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:25 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Film "died" for me this week Richard Then WTF did you refer to that lens as a $100 lens? Canon has never given anything away free. Try another story, Jerry rclompus@cox.net wrote: > The $999 is for the 18-55mm zoom lens. Canon throws the Rebel 6.3 > MP camera in for free. > > Richard > > > > From: "David Rodgers" <davrodgers@msn.com> > > Date: 2004/02/01 Sun PM 11:55:08 EST > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Film "died" for me this week > > > > Richard > > > > $999 is cheap? Or were you referring to how it feels? > > > > DaveR > > > > > > > > I had the opportunity to try out and view some 8 1/2 X 11 color > prints > > > from the Canon Rebel with the $100 18-55mm lens. The whole > deal > > > costs $999. I was blown away with the quality and depth of the > photos > > > from such a cheap outfit. > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/ > unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html