Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Printing costs
From: sam <sam@osheaven.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:13:51 -0500
References: <125.2b53b38b.2d70bf9b@aol.com> <403F7247.7010902@osheaven.net> <D3319887-694D-11D8-965A-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

My first sort is into three boxes, keepers, throw-aways, and family 
content. It's fun coming back 5 years later to a slide (or snapshot) 
that has no merit other than you love the person pictured.

Sam S



John Collier wrote:

> My problem is that most of stuff ends up projected (1.5m x 2m and 
> largely to scare BD away) and digital is just not there yet AFAIK. It 
> would be great to be able to do no-cost editing. Hell I would sell my 
> first born (cheap and you would know why if you have ever had a 17 yr 
> old daughter) to be able to do so. Later today I am picking up 34 rolls 
> of slides (1224 images) and will probably only end up projecting a 
> couple of hundred or so (if I am lucky but most of it is family stuff 
> and I am not allowed to throw away as much as I would like -- again to 
> scare BD away).
> 
> I also do not develop my personal work right away. I like to wait 
> anywhere from a few months to a year so that I am emotionally detached 
> from the images. I find it is easier to edit this way as you are seeing 
> the image fresh and your memories do not colour your judgment. Weird I 
> will admit but it works for me. I would need a great many large memory 
> cards to do this if I went digital. Handy maybe; cheaper, I am not so 
> sure...
> 
> John Collier
> 
> On Feb 27, 2004, at 9:37 AM, sam wrote:
> 
>> Ha ha, I see your problem. You shoot color negative. If you shot 
>> slides you could blow the darn thing up to the size of the wall. 
>> Seriously, I have stopped using color neg. materials. I shoot mostly 
>> b&w and slides. Slides are perfect if you need an enlared negative 
>> which I often do.
>>
>> LRZeitlin@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> You guys who print everything are clearly much better photographers 
>>> than me. I estimate that only one in ten of my pictures are worth 
>>> enlarging to greater than 4x6". I'm also one of those guys that is 
>>> incapable of assessing ultimate picture quality from a postage stamp 
>>> sized negative in reversed colors so I printed up far more pictures 
>>> than I wanted to keep. My wastebasket was overflowing.
>>> Digital has been a godsend. I can view scads of pictures on a 20" 
>>> monitor and print only those that are decent. At current prices for 
>>> quality inkjet inks and photo quality paper, my wallet thanks me.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from LRZeitlin@aol.com ([Leica] Re: Printing costs)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Printing costs)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Printing costs)