Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica/Digital - heresy?
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Thu Aug 12 12:08:05 2004
References: <20040811164616.10883.qmail@web50506.mail.yahoo.com> <002701c48088$8011e320$87d86c18@ted><411BA518.6010805@netscape.net> <411BB07B.6070705@adrenaline.com> <09f001c4809a$90af4120$0200a8c0@Desk> <1092336170.4765.1534.camel@failsafe> <0a0c01c4809f$05d30f50$0200a8c0@Desk>

On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 12:03, robertmeier@usjet.net wrote:
> Is it as dim as the N80?

Not sure, I've never handled a N80. But it's not as good as what's
on the FM3A or even my old Minolta X570(?).


Feli



In reply to: Message from lowiemanuel at yahoo.ca (Emanuel Lowi) ([Leica] decline in LUG membership)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] WAS: decline in LUG membership NOW: Comparison questions)
Message from DouglasMSharp at netscape.net (Douglas M. Sharp) ([Leica] Leica/Digital - heresy?)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Leica/Digital - heresy?)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (robertmeier@usjet.net) ([Leica] Leica/Digital - heresy?)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Leica/Digital - heresy?)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (robertmeier@usjet.net) ([Leica] Leica/Digital - heresy?)