Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Next e-mail: help
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sun Nov 21 01:14:13 2004
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20041120011410.05aa2480@192.168.100.42> <6.1.0.6.2.20041120124727.054aa068@192.168.100.42> <675FA575-3B69-11D9-BF65-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <6.1.0.6.2.20041121003016.058a3ee8@192.168.100.42> <3BDBCC42-3B9C-11D9-BF65-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au>

Yes, 40 separate files. You give it a standard prefix (e.g. IMG) and tell 
it how many digits to use for filenames and the SW increments them within 
the destination folder. The Nikon scanners have ICE so no scratches and 
dust at the expense of slightly softer scan. A small amount of USM fixes 
that so it's worth it. I develop my own slides and that's how I get quick 
scans onto the web. For prints, 90% of the time I use the 1280. My love 
hate printer. It works well enough but it clogs like mad. There is less 
selection of artsy matt paper. Then again, if you like the glossy look, 
there are more glossy choices for dye sub than pigment printer like the 2200.

As for printing, it depends on what you want to do :-) It took about 2 
years to finally get where I want to be, and it's relatively simple once I 
know how it's done :-) The most important thing is to calibrate your 
monitor and printer. If you are pedantic, profile your scanner too, I am 
much happier now that my scans looks like the slides.

Or you can do what Ted does - just put everything on auto!!

At 01:03 AM 11/21/2004, Alastair Firkin wrote:

>This may be a stupid question, but does it scan as separate (40) files, is 
>is friendly to the film: ie no scratching, when its finished, do you have 
>to re-touch or alter the files one by one or is the result usually close 
>to perfect. If you print from these files do you find you are completely 
>happy with the results, and how do you print from the files?
>
>Cheers
>On 21/11/2004, at 7:31 PM, Richard wrote:
>
>>Alastair, I have a Nikon LS-4000 w/ the roll film adapter. It can scan in 
>>a roll of up to 40 pics all by itself. It really is a nice system.
>>
>>At 06:59 PM 11/20/2004, Alastair Firkin wrote:
>>>This question rests with the ability of "scanners". Will a scanned 
>>>negative file match one from a dedicated digital camera pixel for pixel? 
>>>Is there a scanner which can do the scanning without me having to sit 
>>>for hours, ie a feeder? Please help. I have a week to go before coming 
>>>to the USA and visiting Chicago: the subject of the next e-mail and I 
>>>could be tempted to do something on that trip.
>>
>>// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
>>use richard at imagecraft.com)
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>Alastair
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Next e-mail: help)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Advice needed: Should I set up a darkroom or not?)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Advice needed: Should I set up a darkroom or not?)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Next e-mail: help)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Next e-mail: help)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Next e-mail: help)