Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] why wait for the DMR?
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Dec 29 16:44:56 2004
References: <BAY19-F11A165E77AF6AD4CEBC4CDED9C0@phx.gbl>
 
What I don't understand it why do people say "why wait for the XXX?" If 
your decision is made, go get the gears of your choice and keep shooting 
away!!!

Certainly, I am SURE that the 1DsMkII will give the most excellent result, 
as will the DMR when it comes out. Make a decision, keep shooting, don't 
look back.

At 04:34 PM 12/29/2004, eric korenman wrote:

>Why are we waiting for the DMR for the R8/9 if it the addition of a DMR 
>back is going to cost about the same as the Canon 1DS mkII?
>
>At 16.7 million pixels it is a tempting option as I use my R8 mostly for 
>studio work.
>I am trying to convince myself that I will miss the option to shoot film, 
>but who am I (we) kidding.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies: Reply from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] why wait for the DMR?)
 In reply to: Message from leica_korenman at hotmail.com (eric korenman) ([Leica] why wait for the DMR?)