Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: CC filters (was: Re: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 124)
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Wed Feb 2 16:34:14 2005
References: <00df01c5094f$c1426ef0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

At 12:50 PM -0500 2/2/05, B. D. Colen wrote:
>There are definitely times when PS offers the best, if not the only
>option for color correction. But keep in mind that making changes in
>Photoshop is rarely 'cost free,' in terms of the digital file. So if you
>can make the adjustments in camera if shooting digital, or with filters
>if shooting film, you're probably better off than routinely depending
>upon Photoshop.
>

It's 'cost free' if you shoot RAW, or rather, it doesn't matter what 
the camera is set at. When you convert it, import it, whatever, the 
software will show the file as it was 'tagged' by the camera 
software, but the info is the same no matter what parameters you set. 
Note that using filters with a digital camera doesn't really gain you 
as much as you might think, as you filter out some information that 
you don't want, and therefore relatively boost some other info. 
Photoshop, or rather Camera Raw, does similar things but you are not 
penalized as much w.r.t. shooting sensitivity.

If you shoot jpegs, you lose info when not shooting at the correct 
colour balance, so do your adjusting before you fire.

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) (CC filters (was: Re: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 124))
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) (CC filters (was: Re: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 124))