Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Richard's fourth RD-1 (WAS: We had company)
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Jul 27 19:47:28 2005
References: <200507251608.j6PG5i8S013072@server1.waverley.reid.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20050725224257.00be14a0@mail.2alpha.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050725233008.061ec088@192.168.100.42> <42E71D9C.7030401@planet.nl> <4dccee3d05072719365b2fc8c6@mail.gmail.com>
 
Yes, the R-D1 is only for the small class of people who wants a digital 
capture for their M lens, and don't mind paying the bucks to be the 
trailblazers. It's not like Epson is pointing a gun at anyone's head to 
make them buy the camera :-)

Everything has flaws. Even the MP has (unexcusable) dusty viewfinder and 
the (at least some people love it) rewind crank.

At 07:36 PM 7/27/2005, David Mason wrote:
>I can't agree more with you Nathan - the more I hear from the RD1
>owners on this list about that problems, the more I am sure a) I
>wouldn't get one b) wouldn't be so nice to Epson about those problems.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com)
In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] We had company)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] We had company)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: Richard's fourth RD-1 (WAS: We had company))
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Re: Richard's fourth RD-1 (WAS: We had company))