Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR at 1600 iso
From: leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens)
Date: Fri Sep 30 14:31:45 2005
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20050930105226.0489ca20@mail.robsteve.com> <BF62BF9F.6041%bdcolen@comcast.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20050930132416.048ae470@mail.robsteve.com> <007901c5c5dd$ee164b90$6101a8c0@jimnichols> <6.2.3.4.2.20050930143351.048ac310@mail.robsteve.com> <009801c5c605$0b490c80$6101a8c0@jimnichols>
 
Jim:

It wasn't meant to be blind.  I just figured people would know by the 
file names and exif data.

Regards,

Robert

At 06:22 PM 9/30/2005, Jim Nichols wrote:

>Robert,
>
>I did not state my guess at the cameras used, but chose the Leica 
>DMR results as "best", in my opinion.  Congratulations on presenting 
>a blind comparison, which, to me, shows the DMR to produce realistic 
>results.  The other photo has a "glow", but it looks contrived.
>
>Jim Nichols
>Tullahoma, TN USA
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
>--
>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.6/111 - Release Date: 9/23/2005


-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.6/111 - Release Date: 9/23/2005
In reply to: Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)