Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with you Jim, From the user point of view the older cameras are fine, from the camera mechanics POV they are a PITA. The IIIc and subsequent cast shutter crates are much cheaper to make accurate and require no, or less shimming on assembly so they are overall much cheaper to make. The previous models are all hand made from sheet brass, which is a more stable material than cast ally. My favourite is the II as I have a love of simplicity so I find the slower speeds redundant. Frank On 8 Jan, 2006, at 17:33, Jim Nichols wrote: > John, > I've had a Leica IIIa for over 50 years, and now also have a IIIf. > As I understand it, the stiffer shutter box structure of the late > models is all inside the shell of the camera. While the IIIa does > not have the reinforced lens mount ring of the IIIc and later, I > have used lenses up to 135mm on it and have found no problems. I > can tell no difference in the feel of the outer shell of the IIIa > and IIIf. Don't sell the early models short. They are fine cameras. > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information