Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Sun Sep 3 17:56:23 2006
References: <200609031717.k83HCoBM096229@server1.waverley.reid.org> <44FB44DF.6020609@telefonica.net> <7.0.1.0.0.20060903142519.01c04658@telus.net> <82c9dd70609031705h2cf8c3c4p159ac7eb0bf60519@mail.gmail.com> <44FB7166.7010205@adrenaline.com>
On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:20 PM, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
> Is it a safe assumption that the greater the bit depth the better
> the tonal gradation and separation in the shadows?
Greater bit depth has the potential for better tonal gradation or
dynamic range or a bit of both depending on the firmware.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
Replies:
Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
In reply to:
Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at telus.net (David Young) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))