Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Sep 3 18:03:07 2006
References: <200609031717.k83HCoBM096229@server1.waverley.reid.org> <44FB44DF.6020609@telefonica.net> <7.0.1.0.0.20060903142519.01c04658@telus.net> <82c9dd70609031705h2cf8c3c4p159ac7eb0bf60519@mail.gmail.com> <44FB7166.7010205@adrenaline.com> <5e126477e50bd2ba791a0df693c01540@earthlink.net>

I can't wait to see the dM.  It should be stunning.  Then again, I probably
should start saving for the R10 as I suspect it will be simply marvelous.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 9/3/06, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:20 PM, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > Is it a safe assumption that the greater the bit depth the better
> > the tonal gradation and separation in the shadows?
>
> Greater bit depth has the potential for better tonal gradation or
> dynamic range or a bit of both depending on the firmware.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at telus.net (David Young) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))