Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Mon Sep 4 08:36:01 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com> <004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <009201c6cf18$0386f9e0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <667e9af89b81d2d50135b9b26d715c80@earthlink.net> <7922F8A9-539B-4606-82E6-D8746DBBBC83@ncable.net.au> <5f48586fbd8d3b5198bbd03150f67b26@earthlink.net> <82c9dd70609040755y76bb6ades562e2a18344831d3@mail.gmail.com> <b4de4492f95ec86813ee15b782de9156@earthlink.net> <82c9dd70609040833k20a4a37byedd6e9121dcfb5ae@mail.gmail.com>

just looked it up on wikipedia. I 'chimp' occasionally but not much.

Eric


On 9/4/06, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  "chimping" ?
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 9/4/06, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like I'm chimping too much.
> >
> > dh
> >
> >
> > On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Eric Korenman wrote:
> >
> > > Doug - I get about 400-500 raw images per battery.
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/4/06, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The biggest problem as I see it is battery life.  I find that the
> > >> battery lasts for about 2 Gb of photos (RAW files), less with
> > >> chimping,
> > >> so a second battery and a means of charging are essential.  For
> > >> car-camping it's not a problem; for backpacking I'd look in to a
> > solar
> > >> charger or a different camera.
> > >>
> > >> Doug Herr
> > >> Birdman of Sacramento
> > >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Leica Users Group.
> > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>

In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))