Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:M8 and the Future
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Thu Oct 26 06:03:13 2006
References: <c4b.629c076.3270021c@aol.com><22c93b290610241841k2d1d1d24xa9ce1a9482b3ccc4@mail.gmail.com><9376F541-A7F5-4BEF-ACB3-5965B7AD3523@steveunsworth.co.uk><22c93b290610251447k3dfb4b0fgec061c3e0f52bbaa@mail.gmail.com> <045FA9A2-131E-4C01-9D0F-DF170289D3AB@btinternet.com> <006f01c6f904$5c620170$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
 
AH. Now I know why I never see used Canons at my local shop.
Len


On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:40 AM, Christopher Williams wrote:

> So that's around 3,000,000 cameras that will be sent to a trash  
> dump in less
> than 10 years.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Dernie" Subject: M8 and the Future
>
>
>> I read that Canon sold 250,000 EOS 350D per month. That is more than
>> the total Leica M3 production, the highest published production model
>> Leica ever. Canon can amortise the development cost over tens of
>> thousands more units. They will always be cheaper.
>> Frank
>> On 25 Oct, 2006, at 22:47, Matt Powell wrote:
>>
>>> Even in the M6 days, you were party of a tiny minority, right? 1  
>>> Leica
>>> sold for every 100 good Canon bodies.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:M8 and the Future)