Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO)
Date: Mon Nov 6 21:36:12 2006
References: <00c401c70155$4d761260$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <454EB466.3090205@eth.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061106070325.024ecdb0@infoave.net> <454FDF93.7050900@eth.net> <002401c7021d$b4461f30$a302a8c0@ted> <455008FC.5000207@eth.net>
Jayanand Govindaraj writes in part:
> Why is it that everyone gets defensive if any criticicism of Leica is
> posted?
Criticism without basis (i.e. lack of actual experience) is not well
received anywhere that I'm aware of. This includes the Lug.
Greg J. Lorenzo
Calgary, Alberta
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)