Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Jeffrey, I am not sure a low end Mac is going to be your best choice. They all have Intel processors now and until Adobe brings out a Mac version optimised for these processors it is not fast on Macs. I think Adobe are letting their legions of Mac customers down here but now that Apple are in competition with them on software perhaps the "special relationship" is wearing thin. The extra memory will almost certainly help on the PC, that is what I would try first. I am not sure the memory management is much different on Macs and PCs these days. Pre OSX one could allocate memory personally, in OSX it is allocated in the OS and whilst Adobe has a preference allowing the user to encourage OSX to use larger proportions of the memory it still, on my Mac, is slow to allocate very much of the 6Gb of ram to photoshop, even when I have nothing else open. I don't know why, perhaps they want Photoshop to be as slow as Aperture ;-) Warning - I use both Macs and PCs but don't have a PC version of photoshop so this is speculative rather than definitive. Frank On 19 Nov, 2006, at 22:42, Jeffery Smith wrote: > My current Gateway computer works fine for just about everything. > It was a > top-end screamer when I bought it nearly 4 years ago. But using it > with > Photoshop CS is enough to push me nearly over the edge. Sometimes > it takes > 20 seconds to respond to an [Alt] push when using the healing > brush. It is > simply too slow and too limited in resources to work well or even > marginally > with Photoshop CS. I feel that I have two choices: > > (1) Buy 4 gb of memory and see if that speeds things up > (2) Buy a low end Mac and use it for PS CS2 only > > For those of you out there who are Mac aficionados, what would be a > reasonable lower end Mac for use with PS CS2 keeping in mind that I > will be > using it for that ONLY. Maybe an iMac in the $1,500 to $2,000 area? > Doesn't > the Mac handle memory and resources better than Windows XP. Your > thoughts > and suggested are heartily welcomed. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > http://www.400tx.com > http://400tx.blogspot.com/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information