Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Thu Nov 30 18:11:49 2006
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061127195756.024204c8@infoave.net> <9b678e0611272028i2a96c2b0x9ae6683d2e364bbd@mail.gmail.com> <4cfa589b0611272044q6eaa957aqb002133dd90f480@mail.gmail.com> <82c9dd70611290356w1f8db51cqd8f021f8b07b3e5d@mail.gmail.com> <4cfa589b0611290837y6490568cgece69d951279402@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0611291718u18b3c9c5rafcbf72f8c8dffbe@mail.gmail.com> <007301c71423$784ad710$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>

Chris,
It is standard in the industry to quote maximum throughput.  This means that
if I sent an order from the PIC for 4500 prints the 390 would have them all
out within an hour.  The best I ever saw in production was 46 rolls of 24
double prints dry to dry in an hour but the tech was really hustling to get
it done and she had a C-41 that would process in just over seven minutes.
Using the bulk loader she sent twenty rolls through at a time and she did
use the auto-print function so start a roll, twin check a roll, package a
roll, start a roll....

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 11/29/06, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> Hey Don, 4,5000 prints an hour? That's printing over 120 rolls of film an
> hour? That's even allot for one day. The new 590 only does
> 1800 per hour. And we all know that's if your human printer is damn good!
>
> Noritsu started coming out with digital inkjet printers a few years ago.
> Real dawgs, print heads always going out of alignment, ink
> sensor problems, interface was a joke running on Windozs 2000. I'm sure or
> hope the newer versions are 100% improved.
>
> Chris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Dory"
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses
>
>
> > Adam,
> > The c-41 machines are going into the landfill.  The non-digital printers
> are
> > going into the landfill as even the fourth world is digital now.  The
> lower
> > end digital printers are going into the landfill; the 390 was Fuji's top
> of
> > the line machine at roughtly $250,000 five or six years ago.  Now you
> can
> > buy a reconditioned one for under $40,000.  In February they were close
> to
> > $50,000 so the depredciation is huge.  As to cost, the 390 is hugely
> > reliable, maintenance costs are really very small as they swallow huge
> > amounts of paper(roughly 4500 4X6 prints an hour all day) without
> > complaint.  They work off a chemical cartridge that is about $100 which
> > supplies developer, bleach, and fix; one cartridge will do maybe 10,000
> > prints if I remember correctly and I may not be.  The real issue is that
> > they need a goodly number of prints a day to stay properly replinished,
> > possibly as few as a few hundred.  Plus the electricity to keep 120
> liters
> > of chemistry at 38C.
> >
> > The smaller labs are going to an ink jet system that delivers prettty
> good
> > quality very flexibly.
> >
> > Don
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: M7, M8, Film, Digital, same lenses)