Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun Feb 11 12:08:31 2007
References: <3280493C-7263-4F11-BD0E-F63FE0ED2D6C@pandora.be><007501c74d5d$979db1a0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <6860C641-C00D-4DA1-9767-3B943900A7C0@pandora.be> <013e01c74e16$435242a0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
Scaldis is so obscure that you have to look for it even in Belgium.
So that's quite a catch! Was it good? 12? can be quite hefty ;-)
Philippe
Op 11-feb-07, om 20:53 heeft Christopher Williams het volgende
geschreven:
> I found Hoegaarden White,St Bernardus, and Scaldis?
>
> And I realized I misspelled "Belgian" in my earlier post.
> Chris
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Orlent" Subject: Re:
> [Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
>
>
>> Cheers Chris,
>> What did you drink then? ;-)
>> Philippe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies:
Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
In reply to:
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)