Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 cleaning mystery
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sat Sep 1 16:59:29 2007
References: <200709012129.l81LRC72095660@server1.waverley.reid.org> <46D9E913.6060001@verizon.net> <3BCC7F7F-E4D8-4181-9723-85E040B514A4@comcast.net> <20070901230456.GA12989@panix.com>

Mine is very very red and I still have it. It's funny about this
thread because I was about to post a similiar question a while ago and
then the idea slipped into the infinite bit-bucket (part of my mind is
write-only memory, I'm sure) and I never asked.

They made a small brush for cleaning the stylus too. I even have some
fluid left for both of them should I need to put on a Sheffield
direct-to-disk recording to demonstrate what analog recording was all
about. I've now completely forgotten everything I ever knew about
cartridges and my Hafler pre-amp is gathering dust. (I didn't ever get
into the extreme audiophile world with $100 cables. Once I started
seeing fiber-optic cables going for those kind of prices I realized
that it was total foolishness.)

Adam

On 9/1/07, Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> wrote:
> to disambiguate "zerostat" and "staticmaster"
>
> the "staticmaster" was a normal-looking brush with the polonium.
>
> http://www.orau.org/PTP/collection/consumer%20products/staticeliminator.htm
>
> the "zerostat" looked like a groovy white plastic pistol
>
> (the one below is blue, and i don't know if i am more
> surprised that they still make it, or that its A HUNDRED
> BUCKS now!)
>
> http://store.acousticsounds.com/browse_detail.cfm?title_ID=10413
>
> of the two, i liked the zerostat much better.  25 years ago when
> i last used them.
>
> -rei
>
> On Sep01 18:48, Leonard Taupier wrote:
> > Hi Stan,
> >
> > I still have and use the Zerostat. I don't think it reduces dust but
> > rather neutralizes the electrostatic charge that builds up on the
> > vinyl and causes the disturbing pops during playback. Since the
> > sensor in a digital camera is charged when taking a photo I don't
> > think I would want to mess with that process.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Len
> >
> >
> > On Sep 1, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Stan Yoder wrote:
> >
> > >A thought: back in the era of vinyl LP recordings, the Discwasher
> > >company marketed a pistol-shaped "Zerostat" device that, when you
> > >slowly pulled the trigger, 'sprayed' the vinyl with (I think)
> > >negative ions to (at least temporarily) lessen the LP's dust
> > >attraction.
> > >
> > >Would that idea work with sensors?
> > >
> > >I still have the Zerostat. I think it uses Polonium(?) as a source
> > >of ions.
> > >
> > >Stan Yoder
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Leica Users Group.
> > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> --
> Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
> Ridgewood, New Jersey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] M8 cleaning mystery)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] M8 cleaning mystery)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] M8 cleaning mystery)