Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work)
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:51:35 2007
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC803083944EF@exchange8.asc.local> <46FF6D91.1040007@hemenway.com> <000601c80351$4be56be0$6401a8c0@asus930> <471B7676-3F5A-4F05-914F-C9C6A3A88E70@cox.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20070930132131.0249d030@comporium.net> <D04F9AF2-C40C-46E9-8038-F2F75E62EABE@cox.net> <C193A720-D8A8-44E6-A43F-7073F249E961@mac.com> <4701223B.8000505@waltjohnson.com> <47013092.5030000@numericable.fr> <B5026FCC-3BE7-4371-9246-A45E23939BAB@cox.net> <47013709.1050500@waltjohnson.com> <1BE06EDB-74B5-4957-81D8-67E8CDE9C609@mac.com> <470138E2.4010701@waltjohnson.com> <D8172F9A-FA83-49A3-881E-D9F2FDB41805@pandora.be>

Mercy bucoop. Glad I accomplished at least that today. :-)

Philippe Orlent wrote:
>> Next I'll be accused of dirty stuff.
>
> Walt, you are so right.
> With all the fuzz about SEX this was becoming a very frivolous 
> discussion. So very fin de si?cle.
> Meanwhile, we're almost 8 years already into the new millenium.
> For how long will we have to suffer this 20th century puritanism?
> No, the turn you gave this interpretation battle is so much more 
> interesting.
>
> About photography, I think a photo can never be real. It can only give 
> an impression of reality.
> Impression leads to interpretation. Interpretation to discussion. 
> Which makes this all so interesting.
>
> Philippe
>
>>
>> Lottermoser George wrote:
>>> I like it. Rings true - this slicing of reality into little fake 
>>> pieces (i think hole mixes metaphors ;~)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george@imagist.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or is it slice the reality into little fake holes?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))