Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote: > >> I have the 15 Super Elmar (not the 2.8). I find it a lovely lens and >> a fine performer. I have little to "compare" it to. >> Don't have the WATE or Nikon 14 etc.. >> I also have the 15 Heliar. What sort of comparison do you seek? > >> >> On Nov 5, 2007, at 5:54 PM, telyt@earthlink.net wrote: >> >>> so.... nobody knows how the 15 R compares? >> > > flare & distortion at least, full frame preferable. I find it a bit odd > that > a discussion of 14-15-16mm lenses includes such diverse tools as those > made by > Cosina, Nikon, Canon and others but no R > > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > I can give you 7,975 reasons. That's a lot of reasons! Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com