Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think that the scanning method is the best option. I'd only take out the grain IFO print sizes, so keep that for post scan phase in PS, and save the original scan as a 'RAW'. Color could be better indeed, though. The 5D's sensor seems not to capture the grain, so lacks 'sharpness'. Which is harder to 'recreate' than to soften an image that is too 'grainy'. Must be because the Coolscan's scanner is slow pass so more detailed. Philippe Op 11-nov-07, om 19:50 heeft Tina Manley het volgende geschreven: > PESO: > > Here are the comparisons of the Kodachrome slide scanned vs > duplicated with actual pixel crops: > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/scanning_ > > What do you think? I think I'm going to experiment some more with > the scanner and see if I can get better color and less grain using > GEM and ROC. 64 ISO films should not be this grainy but Kodachrome > seems to scan that way. > > Tina > > Tina Manley > ASMP, NPPA, EP, PI > http://www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >