Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Summarit Reviews
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov)
Date: Sat Jan 12 07:15:01 2008
References: <20080112115915.8C0E92FC4C@donald.hostspirit.ch> <C3AE1EBE.83D29%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20080112134313.35B9E2FC4F@donald.hostspirit.ch>

What a truncated test (though the latin definition of 'maimed' seems  
more appropriate)!
I don't think I'll be trading in my 50mm Elmarit-M anytime soon.
s.d.


On Jan 12, 2008, at 5:43 AM, Didier Ludwig wrote:

I guess his negs really showed that difference, but the resized 72dpi  
jpgs didn't - so he helped a bit to make the jpgs looking like his  
negs. I have several times had the impression he's not very savvy  
with creating web formats. But I have seen Summarit real life sample  
photograps posted in the web that looked good. Just good. So what.
D.



At 13:37 12.01.2008, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> Well Erwin of course would not do that. Even if he had a reason to  
> and I
> can't see what that reason would be.
> Though I can see how you can see it looks like that by  just  
> looking at it.


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Summarit Reviews)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Summarit Reviews)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Summarit Reviews)