Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Plans
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Thu Jan 24 07:38:20 2008
References: <000901c85e44$dcec9b60$6701a8c0@xyw> <008601c85e48$c3783370$4a689a50$@net> <1DDD40EE-82ED-498D-9782-3B267A798A20@nathanfoto.com> <BAY140-W4DA49FBEAF912D7DE7E4BC7380@phx.gbl>

D-CL = M8 sensor
M9 =  full frame?
phx
 

Javier Perez wrote:

>I was wondering for some time about a CL sized M. 
>It's been possible for awhile. But I don't see how they would be able to 
>justify a full sized M after that.
>Javier
>_________________________________________________________________
>Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
>http://biggestloser.msn.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
In reply to: Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Leica Plans)
Message from summarex at hotmail.com (Javier Perez) ([Leica] Leica Plans)