Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: KE-7
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Tue Apr 8 03:26:52 2008
References: <1207540904.47f99ca8b82b9@panthermail.uwm.edu><BAY113-F35D61C0A8DC047EE8349DD8CF30@phx.gbl> <200804072038.m37Kcp3O079177@server1.waverley.reid.org> <32FED6B88B984633B40CFFC99D9B380F@Joseph>
 
Thanks

I have been advised by a very knowledgeable collector that the 50/2.8 
Elmar collapsible (classical version) is a higher performer than the 
50/2 Elcan. 

He says that he has personally used both.

Does any else have experience with the 50/2 Elcan, or have test or MTF data?

regards
Vick

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Marc
> James Small
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 April, 2008 4:29 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: KE-7
>
> .....  I have never used a 2/50 Elcan but others on this List have done 
> so.  I understand that it is a pretty good lens in all regards.
>
> Marc
>
>
> msmall@aya.yale.edu
> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)
Message from joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)