Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]frank i have had the 4000 and currently have the 5000. overall the same with the 5000 being a faster one. same resolution just a bit more option that won't make that much difference (d-lighting is one that comes to mind, and only if u use the nikon software) on the roll adapter, there is a trick that can turn the regular 6 strip to a roll reader, u just have to open the back as though u have a roll adapter. i use the nikon software and hamrik's vuscan interchangeably. there is a but with the current xp version of nikon that hangs now and then On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote: > Anyone have experience with these 2 scanners? I am interested in getting > my > full roll negatives scanned....( MA-30 Roll adapter required) > > I have been using a local 1 HR lab, but I am tired of getting 1.5MB files > ..... for 4x6 prints.... I want larger files for editing.... and they do > not > seem to be able to perform this service, repeatedly and reliably. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad