Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, Both are tools, and each has its place for convenience and usefulness. I doubt that anyone can make out the difference between the cameras in a print or published photo, though. Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Tina Manley <images@comporium.net> wrote: > At 12:02 PM 9/25/2008, you wrote: > >> If this makes me a bitcher? So be it, as I feel I've earned a spot to do >> so >> after all the faithful years of always working with 3 M's and 3 motor >> driven >> SLR's as the assignments dictated. I'm still a believer and extol the >> Leica >> quality and where, when and why one should use an M camera. But the >> yearning >> for new bits is pretty low to the barrel bottom at the moment! >> >> ted >> > > But the bottom line, for me, is when I compare the photos from my M8 to my > photos from my Canon 5D or my Canon 1DMII, there is no question about which > is best. People on other e-mail lists are complaining about fringing, > chromatic aberrations, and soft focus from the newest offering from Canon > and the solution that some offer is to "fix it in Photoshop." Leica > digital > files don't need fixing. I'll eat beans and rice and wait months or years > to pay for that quality. > > Tina > > Tina Manley > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >