Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA
From: leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Mon Dec 22 11:08:52 2008
References: <5f1be6b50812210900p2a65d110t99a3b0601940e0bb@mail.gmail.com>, <5f1be6b50812210900p2a65d110t99a3b0601940e0bb@mail.gmail.co m>, <200812211825.BHN53080@rg5.comporium.net>
Quoth the Tina Manley :
> At 12:00 PM 12/21/2008, you wrote:
> > >BUT IT IS NOT A LEICA.
>
> Of course it's a Leica! It has a red dot doesn't it. ;-)
But it doesn't have a cloth shutter or a screw-in lens. So it can't
be a REAL Leica.
And you can't make good photos with anything except a REAL Leica, no
matter what it is or who you are.
--
R. Clayton McKee http://www.rcmckee.com
Photojournalist rcmckee@rcmckee.com
P O Box 571900 voice/fax 713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900 cell phone # on request
Replies:
Reply from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
Reply from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
In reply to:
Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)