Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Dec 22 11:19:14 2008
References: <5f1be6b50812210900p2a65d110t99a3b0601940e0bb@mail.gmail.com> <200812211825.BHN53080@rg5.comporium.net> <494F9156.192.FE4C86@leica.rcmckee.com>
 
Which is why I'm not buying another Leica
until
they make a "full frame" digital camera
the size and form factor of a
Leica 0
with the image quality of the S2

; ^ 0)))))))

Fond regards,
George

george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



On Dec 22, 2008, at 1:08 PM, R. Clayton McKee wrote:

> But it doesn't have a cloth shutter or a screw-in lens.  So it can't
> be a REAL Leica.
>
> And you can't make good photos with anything except a REAL Leica, no
> matter what it is or who you are.
In reply to: Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)
Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)