Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Let's see something with an Isco Westron 35 f2.8, or a 20mm f4 Flektogon? Showing a telephoto sample against a wide angle sample is not a credible comparison. S.d. On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Jim Nichols wrote: > Hey S.D., > > Let's don't knock the old hardware that can no longer speak for > itself. I never used Soviet film, but I can speak for the Exacta/ > Exa family. My Exacta died, but its little brother, the Exa, still > marches on. The link below shows what the Exa can do, even when > equipped with another stepchild, the Steinheil 2.8/85mm Culminar > lens. I don't see an image problem. > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Nose+Gear+Lights.jpg.html > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" > <s.dimitrov at charter.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 5:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Your thoughts on a Voigtl ? nder Lens > > >> I keep seeing these golf ball grain images taken with the 21mm. It >> is really a disservice to the optics not to use a slow, fine grain >> film. >> Most of the examples I've just seen might as well been taken with >> an Exakta using Soviet film. That's not Leica photography as >> passed down by our predecessors. >> S.d. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information