Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] QUESTION????? Kodachrome RIP
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:52:02 +0530
References: <p06230900c666c0a8d0e1@10.1.16.129> <493547920.7337051245780374149.JavaMail.root@sz0090a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>

John,
With a D300, you are going to get more DOF than a film camera, at the same
lenses/settings irrespective of what you do anyway.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:36 PM, J. Newell <john.o.newell at 
comcast.net>wrote:

>
>
> The answer on the slow ISO sensor, was to shoot wide open in bright light.
> I am shooting mostly with a D300 today (sorry), which has a base ISO rating
> of 200 and does not perform optimally below that, but it does have 1/8000th
> shutter speed so that would get you just down to f/2.8 in sunny-16
> conditions.  The note on the ND filters was correct and on my to-do list is
> to buy a couple of ND filters for the more likely lenses.
>
>
>
> I, too, wonder about our Kodachrome memories being better than reality?  I
> need to dig out the projector and some old slides this weekend and see.
> Perhaps we weren't looking for the same thing "back then," either?  I have
> been asking myself whether the habit of pixel-peeping at 100% or more has
> warped our expectations.  I don't think anyone expected to be able to cut
> themselves on a 8x12 foot projection?  Dunno, memory is a tricky thing.
>
>
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] QUESTION????? Kodachrome RIP)
In reply to: Message from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] QUESTION????? Kodachrome RIP)