Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 00:17:12 -0500
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net> <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl> <4B1B0C61.8080207@comporium.net>
 
> Vick Ko wrote:
>> Hmmm.  From reading the blog, the f1 is "good enough".  I don't see
>> much motivating trading up to the f0.95.
>> Better to get an M9.
>>
>> Vick
> And I disagreed with most of his conclusions based on the photos shown!
> The 1.0 results looked better than the .95 in all of them, to me.  I'm
> perfectly happy sticking with my 1.0.
>
> Tina

Thank god for that: imagine if I "had" to change the Nocti. Marital
disaster and a new set of pearls ;-) I'm going to have my Nocti "matched"
to the M8.

Cheers

Alastair
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)