Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:44:01 -0500
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net> <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl>

Vick Ko wrote:
> Hmmm.  From reading the blog, the f1 is "good enough".  I don't see 
> much motivating trading up to the f0.95.
> Better to get an M9.
>
> Vick
And I disagreed with most of his conclusions based on the photos shown!  
The 1.0 results looked better than the .95 in all of them, to me.  I'm 
perfectly happy sticking with my 1.0.

Tina



Replies: Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Reply from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Noctilux - 0.95 vs. 1.0)
Reply from scoutfinch at chartermi.net (Susan Ryan) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)