Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:19:34 -0400
References: <26165494.1278615102974.JavaMail.root@mswamui-backed.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <A36D0F95-D06D-42A3-B791-45DACA039AE3@mac.com> <20100709134629.GD87250@selenium.125px.com> <E1D2FCA4-A57F-4102-9C6B-B42408B55195@mac.com>
On Jul 09, 2010 at 09:12 AM -0500, George Lottermoser wrote:
> Absolutely easy to identify material as 'illustration'.
> I've not seen the issue in the flesh,
> nor read every discussion,
> to know whether this was done or not.
Except in this case it looks like a straight picture. I must say though I
don't know if this alteration was mentioned in the magazine.
I don't like erasing people. It seems mean.
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
In reply to:
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip F) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)